 | | Re: Posting Dates
|
| (...) I don't see it as broken. The date of a message is the date it was composed. The date it was posted is unimportant, imo. :) Dan (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) Nope, that's not what anyone is saying. There would have been a point reached where, had the replies continued, it should have been moved to wherever else if it had nothing to do with trains. It's like, hypothetically, RCX newsgroup, "Hey I'm (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| I quite agree with Lar on the points he relates here (snippage aside). I myself have a vested interest in Lego marketing directly from TLC, but it would be absolutely inappropriate for me to make more than just the casual reference that I make at (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: Posting Dates (Was: The Care and Feedng of Your Trademark (Was: Community Policing...))
|
| (...) Indeed! My most abject apologies Scott. Had I caught that error in the posting scheme, I would never have responded as I did! Again, my apologies! Thank you Rob, for catching that mistake. Admins: What is the deal with this? Is it a function (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: Porthole alternative
|
| (...) Which is why the original post, which had on topic aspects, got merely a ribbing. I whould have hoped that Bram was enough of a thought leader to connect the dots (where his purely market relatd followup should go) without an explicit warning. (...) (24 years ago, 28-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
