 | | Re: Possibility of lugnet.db.inv.discussion?
|
|
Was there ever any decision on this issue? We now have a number of threads about a tool to create inventories in lugnet.db.inv. This may technically violate the charter for that group, but there doesn't seem to be any more appropriate place to post (...) (25 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Joules' alias (was: Re: Won't you give me one more try?)
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Allan Bedford writes: [...] (...) I don't see an urgency to discuss the policy. (...) I didn't catch it. That's the only reason it went on. I certainly would have minded, the same as I do right now. Please don't equate (...) (25 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Joules' alias (was: Re: Won't you give me one more try?)
|
|
Hi Richard! (...) To be frank (err, to be Shiri)... Aww, c'mon, gimme a break. Honestly, Richard; the one thing that makes lugnet so special and friendly and personal is the use of our real life names; the knowledge that people are here with honest (...) (25 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Joules' alias (was: Re: Won't you give me one more try?)
|
|
(...) now there is little doubt. ;) Now that we know that he is breaking the ToS, we have to consider if it is worth bothering about (I can’t say I care). Given that he has two accounts here (one with his apparent real name and the other with his (...) (25 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Darth Joules' alias (was: Re: Won't you give me one more try?)
|
|
Dosent this mean that is real name is clearly understood. He has given it out freely on Lugnet, and therefore under the TOS is allowed to post using an alias Excerpt of the relevant section: unless your real name and identity is clearly understood, (...) (25 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
