 | | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) That assumes you know my motive or decision process for deciding when, and whom, to remind. Which you do not. (...) No, actually it bolsters MY point which is that not every instance needs to be reminded and that some allowance for error and (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) I tried to find a good place farther down the thread to tack this on, but I couldn't; it's wandered too far from the point here. Tim's point (and Larry's point, and Frank's point, and Dan's point, and several other people's point) is that (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) Against better judgement, I am adding another comment to this string. Larry, you made a 'friendly reminder' for mis-using your trademarked name (by assertion), yet, here is someone that mis-used your trademarked name twice! But, because he is (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) well the thread is over, but I don't think Allan will be here to rehash it in his way...he's decided to stick to his "reviews". (...) What kind of Bull is that Lar??? I didn't label it "LAr's thread". I only merely used that as an example of (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Community Policing is a Good Thing(TM) (Was: Re: Do you think there is a market)
|
|
(...) What I think is hilarious (in a sad way) is that (I'm apparently such a lightning rod that?) any conversation that I participate seems to get branded, by people that ought to know better, as my thread. I didn't start that particular thread. I (...) (25 years ago, 24-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
