Subject:
|
Re: Classification of Promo sets on Pause
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Sat, 2 Jan 1999 04:17:47 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
lpien@ctp.iwantnospam.com/AntiSpam/
|
Viewed:
|
487 times
|
| |
|
|
Carbon 60 wrote:
>
> I think the classification of Promotional sets is a bit inconsistent.
> For example some are listed under their theme "Town, General" and some are
> listed under "Promotional, Something".
>
> An example of this is the 2 ANWB sets, the original one is listed under
> Promotional, ANWB and the other is under Town, General when it is clearly a
> Promotional set.
>
> Others, like some soccer sets are listed under "Promotional Set"
>
> I think all these sets should be under one label of "Promotional"
>
> What do you think Todd?
>
> Carbon 60
Disagree. IMNSHO Promotional should be a modifier of availability, not
set type. Both ANWBs are Town, dunno if "general" or not, but the one
with the car transporter available now is "general" I guess.
--
Larry Pieniazek http://my.voyager.net/lar
For me: No voyager e-mail please. All snail-mail to Ada, please.
- Posting Binaries to RTL causes flamage... Don't do it, please.
- Stick to the facts when posting about others, please.
- This is a family newsgroup, thanks.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Classification of Promo sets on Pause
|
| I think the classification of Promotional sets is a bit inconsistent. For example some are listed under their theme "Town, General" and some are listed under "Promotional, Something". An example of this is the 2 ANWB sets, the original one is listed (...) (26 years ago, 2-Jan-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
10 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
