 | | Re: Unique keys for sets —Todd Lehman
|
| | | (...) Oya definitely. I didn't mean overwriting one of the existing ones, sorry for the confusion. There are 8 columns now, so the new one would make sense either at 1 (first), 2 (first), or 9 (last). IMHO, it makes the most sense in column 1, but I (...) (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Unique keys for sets —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) Not a scream, just a squeak. Consider 9, as in last and keep it last if you add something else. It has less useful info to most readers and thus should be in the region the eye reads last. (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Unique keys for sets —Remy Evard
|
| | | | | | lpieniazek@novera.com (Larry Pieniazek) wrote in <386943AA.328BCF33@v...ager.net>: (...) If the key you're talking about is in the form of "8880-1", then I think column 1 makes sense. I would actually be quite happy with that as a solution for a (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Unique keys for sets —Todd Lehman
|
| | | | | | (...) OK, it's in column 9 now (the rightmost). Enjoy. --Todd (25 years ago, 30-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Unique keys for sets —Selçuk Göre
|
| | | | | Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:3869394a.194671...net.com... (...) sense (...) sense (...) it (...) Todd, I think it's just the correct place to say, how about an additional column, too, if there is such an info available, or (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Unique keys for sets —Mike Faunce
|
| | | | The column order matters not to me, as long as it's there. Mike -- Mike Faunce mike at faunce dot com LUGNET #96 "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:3869394a.194671...net.com... (...) sense (...) sense (...) it (...) (25 years ago, 29-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| | | | |
