Subject:
|
Re: Set Inventories - Multi-piece Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Jun 1999 21:39:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
336 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss (blisses@worldnet.att.net) wrote:
: On Thu, 18 Mar 1999 07:48:42 GMT, "Selçuk <teyyareci>"
: <sgore@nospam.superonline.com> wrote:
: >I count minifigs as 1-piece things, and use this format to describe them:
: >
: >"Minifig with Red Legs, Black Hips, Red Arms, Black Hands and Diver Suit
: >Patterned Red Torso, with Glasses and Headset Patterned Male Head"
: >
: >But I've seen that this is not so helpful for you, since it achieves both
: >"long" and "complex" at the same time..:-)
: Since inventories are typically written with one line per item, in a fixed
: column format, the approach you describe also achieves the coveted "doesn't fit
: in the given space" award. ;)
If you lookat Margo Kubiak's listings, she lists heads, torsos and legs
seperately, and then subtracts the number of heads from the total.
-Bill
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Set Inventories - Multi-piece Parts
|
| (...) Since inventories are typically written with one line per item, in a fixed column format, the approach you describe also achieves the coveted "doesn't fit in the given space" award. ;) I suppose it is helpful to remember that no single (...) (25 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
