Subject:
|
Re: Set Inventories - Multi-piece Parts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Mar 1999 12:44:27 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
614 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 18 Mar 1999 07:48:42 GMT, "Selçuk <teyyareci>"
<sgore@nospam.superonline.com> wrote:
> I count minifigs as 1-piece things, and use this format to describe them:
>
> "Minifig with Red Legs, Black Hips, Red Arms, Black Hands and Diver Suit
> Patterned Red Torso, with Glasses and Headset Patterned Male Head"
>
> But I've seen that this is not so helpful for you, since it achieves both
> "long" and "complex" at the same time..:-)
Since inventories are typically written with one line per item, in a fixed
column format, the approach you describe also achieves the coveted "doesn't fit
in the given space" award. ;)
I suppose it is helpful to remember that no single approach to flat-file
inventory-writing will help in all cases. :/
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Set Inventories - Multi-piece Parts
|
| Steve Bliss (blisses@worldnet.att.net) wrote: : On Thu, 18 Mar 1999 07:48:42 GMT, "Selçuk <teyyareci>" : <sgore@nospam.superonline.com> wrote: : >I count minifigs as 1-piece things, and use this format to describe them: : > : >"Minifig with Red (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jun-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Set Inventories - Multi-piece Parts
|
| I count minifigs as 1-piece things, and use this format to describe them: "Minifig with Red Legs, Black Hips, Red Arms, Black Hands and Diver Suit Patterned Red Torso, with Glasses and Headset Patterned Male Head" But I've seen that this is not so (...) (26 years ago, 18-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
5 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
|
|
|
|
