 | | Re: Semi-ADMIN: Pause Train Reference Improvement Work in Good Shape —Todd Lehman
| | | | (...) I'm not (nor do I probably want to spend the time to become) knowledgeable enough about LEGO Trains and train terminology in general to have an opinion here that really is worth any weight, but generally I fall on the side of the fence that (...) (25 years ago, 27-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Semi-ADMIN: Pause Train Reference Improvement Work in Good Shape —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) I don't care EXACTLY about the names either, but we need about 2 more categories than we have now. Name them for the mundanes if you must. However I'd say that "Equipment" OR "maintenance of way" are not at all technical to the point of being (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Semi-ADMIN: Pause Train Reference Improvement Work in Good Shape —Joshua Delahunty
| | | | | (...) If we go for more groups (I prefer fewer, personally, as I really did visit this already and arrived at fewer after quite some thought -- but do not by that token mean to imply I'm not open to the suggestion), I'm actually warming to (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: Semi-ADMIN: Pause Train Reference Improvement Work in Good Shape —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | | (...) Yes. But to keep number of categories, and name length, down to size, perhaps just "Maintenance" or "Maintenance Equipment"? That latter category includes all the sets that MOW Vehicles does, PLUS the washrack (which presumably, (because I'm (...) (25 years ago, 28-Mar-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.trains)
| | | | | | |
