Subject:
|
Re: Once again the suspicious set 371....
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.database
|
Date:
|
Mon, 28 Jan 2002 17:45:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1024 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.database, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> On Saturday, January 26, 2002, at 11:59 PM, Reinhard "Ben" Beneke wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> > I really would like to see a discussion started again now, if set 371
> > is in
> > fact a set which is worth to be published at Lugnet in the database. If
> > it is,
> > it should at least put into the year 1967 instead of 1976. (But why
> > 1967 and
> > not 1966 or 1968?) What has been the reason for taking 371 into the
> > year it
> > appears in?
>
> I agree that this set:
> http://guide.lugnet.com/set/371_2
> appears to belong with these sets:
> http://guide.lugnet.com/set/?qy=1967
>
> From year 1967. I imagine someone entering the data simply transposed
> the year numbers.. It has been pointed out that the paperwork resembles
> that seen here:
> http://guide.lugnet.com/set/343_1
> but I don't see identification of the year's source data in the admin
> notes. I'll look it up in my catalogs when I get a chance.
>
> thanks.
>
> -Suz
While tweaking it, you (or whoever) may want to also tweak the
Brickshelf(tm) instructions link as it links to a (very cool!!! but
apparently different) seaplane set. Or it did for me anyway.
The link you might want to consider linking to is this one:
http://www.brickshelf.com/scans/0000/0371/index.html which looks like this set.
Now, Ben is saying, if I understand him correctly, that he thinks there's a
chance this set is a fake. I have no idea about that.
But I did want to say that I think it's neat how the instructions for this
set (fake or no) assume the builder knows a lot more about the building
process.. the steps are not at the "place every brick separately" level,
they make big jumps, assuming the builder can figure stuff out. That's cool!
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Once again the suspicious set 371....
|
| (...) set. (...) Thanks Suz an Larry for taking your time! I had contact with the former owner of the sets instruction a few month ago (long time after the 371 had appeared). He really made me believe the building instruction does exist and seems to (...) (25 years ago, 30-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Once again the suspicious set 371....
|
| On Saturday, January 26, 2002, at 11:59 PM, Reinhard "Ben" Beneke wrote: [snip] (...) I agree that this set: (URL) to belong with these sets: (URL) From year 1967. I imagine someone entering the data simply transposed the year numbers.. It has been (...) (25 years ago, 28-Jan-02, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
7 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
Active threads in Database
|
|
