 | | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
|
|
(...) Normally, I would agree with that. That's definitely my philosophy too. :) But in this case, let me just say that I have as good a reason to believe what I've heard as any I could ever ask for. I would almost stake my life on this one. I'd (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
|
|
(...) Flawed reasoning. NOONE is EVER right ALL the time. Until we hear from TLC themselves, assume anything you want, but don't be SURE of that assumption. Is it a good idea? Depends on how you/TLC think people will take the scans. 1 - angry that (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: 2000 Dealer catalogue Removal Request Backfire?
|
|
(...) Well, let's get something straight here first: 1. TLC's policy about vendor/retailer catalogs is only half of the issue. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that something known as a "retailer catalog" (which consumers almost *never* see) (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: About this 2000 dealers catalog
|
|
(...) Like I said, I don't know for sure yet. The reason they're very different issues is because one's a copyright infringement on top of a potential publicity rights violation and other is simply a potential publicity rights violation, which it (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: About this 2000 dealers catalog
|
|
(...) Excuse me? So it's alright to release a textual description of something that is supposed to be 'confidential', but not OK to post a graphic of it???? If you are trying to protect TLC's rights by keeping this information from the public, then (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: About this 2000 dealers catalog
|
|
(...) That's a tough one...I don't know yet. Certainly not the pictures until the real consumer catalog comes out (or the sets), but the set numbers and names are a different issue. It's probably OK to list those now, but I'll have to check. --Todd (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Thumbnail images (was: Re: FreeNetnames comes up trumps!)
|
|
(...) straight (...) I did trains, Technic, AZ and Space, but not all in one hit. Grahame did pirates, castle and town. The only large gap in our jount collection (albeit 1000's of miles apart!) is in early Town sets. Huw (25 years ago, 4-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Thumbnail images (was: Re: FreeNetnames comes up trumps!)
|
|
(...) Oops, actually what I meant was that in a given week, it's actually updated several times per day. Not every day, but at least once a week on average, and usually a few sets at once. Or did you mean the old pre-DB HTML pages? --Todd (25 years ago, 4-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Thumbnail images (was: Re: FreeNetnames comes up trumps!)
|
|
(...) On the average, it's actually updated several times per day, statistically... but it depends on which area... (...) Did you send pictures for that? They might be sitting in my inbox -- I'm backlogged. Or they might be in one of the incoming (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Thumbnail images (was: Re: FreeNetnames comes up trumps!)
|
|
(...) Are you going to update the Pause Database in the near future - I know it's time consuming - especially the service packs in the 5xxx range, they have entires but the uploaded pictures of them which I know have been submitted haven't made (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.uk, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.database)
|
