| | Info wanted for set #1601
|
|
Hi, I can not find anything regarding this old set on any Lego reference sites. It is set number 1601 (no name) and has a trolley and overpass. Is this a promotional set only available for a short time in one place? I can not find a date, but I (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Picture references
|
|
(...) Not to overwhelm kl.net, but if a piece can be indentified in an old manual that has been scanned maybe a DB field could mention that. Doesn't have to be a direct link, but it might be a good common reference point. Mark (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Bricktionary
|
|
(...) How about a "known alias" category as well? Maybe include a warning category for the the piece has been mistaken for? The effort doesn't have to be strictly technical. I've submitted a couple sets to the database, and I've been at a loss over (...) (25 years ago, 31-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: Set piece count correction
|
|
I can confirm the count from the box, 23 pieces. Mike (hey for $.54, how can you go wrong? :^) (...) (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: Set piece count correction
|
|
(...) Whoops! I'm not sure' I think that came from a S@H catalog. It certainly wasn't a hand count, though it may have been from the box. Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: Set piece count correction
|
|
(...) Thanks, Jeremy. Question, though -- where does that count come from? - box? - S@H catalog? - hand count? --Todd (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Set piece count correction
|
|
6324 Chopper Cop = 23 pieces (25 years ago, 29-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: Idea for automatic Lugnet Set Database linking
|
|
On Sun, 11 Jul 1999 06:53:49 GMT, Todd Lehman uttered the following profundities... (...) Tommy 2tone? There's a blast from the past.... (25 years ago, 27-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: set 1298
|
|
(...) US-UK set names? (...) There are millions of other issues that are not simple to put into a database. (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: set 1298
|
|
I saw about 5 at the TRU here in Knoxville, TN yesterday. Didn't look that special to me, but I'll give it another look. Adam Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:379b57f7.588328...net.com... (...) West, (...) admin (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: set 1298
|
|
I found them at TRU in west Houston...... there were 4 of them there...... George.... Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:379b57f7.588328...net.com... (...) West, (...) admin (...) (25 years ago, 26-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: set 1298
|
|
(...) Goodness...its still July...what am I thinking! (25 years ago, 25-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: set 1298
|
|
(...) There were four and a place on the shelf with a sticker below for them. I know its only august, but I couldn't resist. This was in Anderson, SC. I was surprised, but very pleased. I wonder if S@H will have them now.... (25 years ago, 25-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: set 1298
|
|
(...) Rilly?! Here in the US you found one of these? Maybe I was asleep, but I thought this wasn't released here. Lots of 'em left? Only found one? (...) 2 Santas -- wow! (...) Hmm, not sure yet how to deal with this. We'll have to create a special (...) (25 years ago, 25-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | do you need pictures?
|
|
I bought a couple sets that were listed as no picture available on the database. When I have time I could scan them, if it would be helpful. If needed please email me as I don't read this group regularly. Thanks, Steve (25 years ago, 24-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: Idea for automatic Lugnet Set Database linking
|
|
(...) Or you can do the opposite and require special markup around the number to be considered a set # for automatic linking. Some ideas: I'd really like to my hands on a set:5952-2: soon! I'd really like to my hands on a <SET>5952-2</SET> soon! (...) (25 years ago, 22-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Technic Inventories Needed
|
|
Hello, I have some questions which I hope will be answered. First is this the correct group for these questions? Second, I would like inventories for 8840 and 8250. Third, if these have not been inventoried, and I choose to inventory them, will (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jul-99, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: Idea for automatic Lugnet Set Database linking
|
|
(...) <SNIP> Hmmm... Here's an idea. If I'm talking about set #295 instead of my bowling score, I could type "...telephone from :295: is my favorite....". Just a random thought... Charles (25 years ago, 11-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: Idea for automatic Lugnet Set Database linking
|
|
Todd Lehman wrote in message ... (...) Here's another idea! How about using a spacer GIF image as the link?! 8x5 pixels is probably big enough. Tell people that they can click on the "space" after a set# to look it up. You do this for all suspect (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.database)
|
|
| | Re: Idea for automatic Lugnet Set Database linking
|
|
I don't think it would be sloppy at all. I think the benifit of being able to reference a set would vastly outweigh the cases where people are talking about their 1998 corvette. Besides, it would be a subtle reminder to stay topical. It might be a (...) (25 years ago, 11-Jul-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish, lugnet.admin.database)
|