 | | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | New Life On Mars Set #7303
|
|
Subject says it all. According to previously found Life On Mars Value Packs we know that a special LEGO set numbered #7303 will be available later in 2001. Well, now here is the first picture: (URL) Christian --- xTI@N. ---...--- Lugnet Member #479 (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.general, lugnet.year.2001)
|
| |
| | Re: Set database correction
|
|
(...) fixed, thanks! (24 years ago, 13-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Set database correction
|
|
5561 Big Foot 4x4 has 748 pcs according to my boxes Frank (24 years ago, 13-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: 6618 Blue Racer - piece count
|
|
Just an update to this one, I posted to lugnet.db.inv recently. The Piece Count is 23 (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jan-01, to lugnet.db.inv, lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Plans to include LCAD or TLG part numbers on inventroy entries?
|
|
(...) The problem there is that the inventories at (URL) are pretty much static/dead data at this point. It's an area that's unlikely to get updated. I believe some of the inventories have been converted (with permission obtained from the list (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Plans to include LCAD or TLG part numbers on inventroy entries?
|
|
(...) Will Do. (...) I meant being able to get visual apperance of peices in the Lugnet Inventories which do not currently include Ldraw/TLG Part Numbers on inventory entries AFAIK. But I will check again.. Thanks!! Alex (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Plans to include LCAD or TLG part numbers on inventroy entries?
|
|
(...) It's a fake. (If I had a copy of Visio I'd have used that.) I'd previously fooled around with the idea of making something real like this for my own collection but the back-and-forth crossreferencing of parts and sets threw me for a loop. (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.db.inv)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle set rating curiosity
|
|
(...) This is inherently a problem with any kind of open forum for evaluations. It is an interesting problem. I feel that eventually, for the web as a whole to be useful, there will have to be some kind of system which allows anyone to rate and (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
| |
| | Re: Castle set rating curiosity
|
|
(...) I hate to resurrect this thread, but I've also noted another trend which disturbs me. I have been adding my name to the sets which I own, which means that I have been cycling through quite a few listings in the set database. I have run across (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jan-01, to lugnet.admin.database)
|
