Subject:
|
Re: Huh?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.curators
|
Date:
|
Tue, 24 Jul 2001 22:52:32 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1222 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.curators, Kyle D. Jackson writes:
> Okay, I'm sure it should be painfully obvious, but I'm not
> clear on what the discussions in this group are about. Are
> we designating moderators for the groups? Is responsibility
> for which-groups-get-created-and-go-where being delegated
> away from Suze and Todd?
>
> I'm confused (no news there!)
Kyle,
To ease your mind...
(From: http://news.lugnet.com/news/post/?lugnet.announce,1180)
In lugnet.announce, Suzanne D. Rich writes:
> ** Curatorships to be available in newsgroups **
> We're starting a new program for member participation. Each discussion area
> (newsgroup) may have its own "curator" - an individual member assigned access to
> the web interface's news page for that group. It allows editing of sidebar
> contents and the creation of new web pages for that group. These will be created
> as FTX documents.
>
> Info about writing FTX documents for building web pages:
> http://www.lugnet.com/publish/ftx/guide/
>
> Curators may also collect related FAQ data for within their area and for
> possible submission to a master FAQ, but curators shouldn't be defined as
> "leaders of" or "experts in" their areas. Selection of curators will be done by
> LUGNET Admin, but suggestions are welcome. Keep in mind that this includes all
> the LUGs, as well as the theme groups and info areas.
So, no moderation of the messages themselves...not content cops (unless
advising folks to move a thread to a more appropriate NG, I assume...but
EVERYONE already does THAT). Just taking some of the pressure off Suzanne
and Todd for the daily doldrums...FAQs and the like. And possibly to add a
bit more administrative "zing", a more active looking involvement by
spreading the work around.
The most important part of the announcement: "...but curators shouldn't be
defined as "leaders of" or "experts in" their areas."
HTH,
Matt
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Huh?
|
| (...) Leaders of, or experts in? no... but "interested in" probably helps... and it might be a good way to build up expertise if one was so inclined. ++Lar (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.curators)
| | | Re: Huh?
|
| (...) Just to be clear, I don't want to see a curator follow up someone's post with "this belongs elsewhere" in any way other than, as you say, it's already done. (...) I see it as *truly* allowing more active involvement. Efforts put in by members (...) (23 years ago, 25-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.curators)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Huh?
|
| Okay, I'm sure it should be painfully obvious, but I'm not clear on what the discussions in this group are about. Are we designating moderators for the groups? Is responsibility for which-groups-get-cre...d-go-where being delegated away from Suze (...) (23 years ago, 24-Jul-01, to lugnet.admin.curators)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
