Results 861 – 880 of about 7700.
|
Search took 0.01 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | Re: query about set 1547
|
| That's funny. I think it looks better with the clip shown in the instructions (the one that holds tools vertically), but Peeron agrees with the photograph of the completed model, listing the clip that holds tools horizontally in their inventory: (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
| |
|  
query
(score: 0.480)
|
|
| |
|
query
(score: 0.480)
|
|
| |
|
query
(score: 0.480)
|
|
| | query about set 1547
|
| G'day, I'm trying to build set 1547 from the instructions on brickshelf, and I was wondering if anyone could enlighten me as to what part should be used in the 'mouth' of the dragon...in the picture at the start the clip is one that would allow (...) (24 years ago, 2-May-02, to lugnet.castle)
| |
|
query
(score: 0.480)
|
|
| |
|
url
(score: 0.480)
|
|
| | Re: LUGNET Posting Policy Update
|
| (...) The part that questions whether FTX is allowed specifically. Images, as they appear in FTX are definitely ALLOWED by that rule, because you are not posting a binary image, as the TOU specifically indicates not to do, you are posting a URL to (...) (21 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.admin.terms)
| |
|
url
(score: 0.480)
|
|
| | Re: balancing bot
|
| (...) There was one design out there that works with standard Lego - but it has (IIRC) two light sensors out on long booms in front and behind the robot. At those distances from the pivot point, they move a much larger distance than if they are (...) (21 years ago, 30-Dec-04, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
|
url
(score: 0.479)
|
|
| | S@H catalog on google
|
| Dunno if it's been mentioned before, but the S@H catalog is now available at google.com: (URL) you should go via (URL) as the above URL will probably change for each catalog. They also have past catalogs available via that link, back to Sept 2001. (...) (21 years ago, 26-Dec-04, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.market.services)
| |
|
url
(score: 0.479)
|
|
| | Re: Inspiration
|
| Im not so sure this is a bug with his site. The link orginally posted in this thread is www.artships.com/index.php/ note the backslash at the end of the url. This is generally not a valid url. But since php uses the information posted after the (...) (21 years ago, 14-Dec-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| |
|
url
(score: 0.479)
|
|
| |
|
url
(score: 0.479)
|
|
| |
|
url
(score: 0.478)
|
|
| | Re: Whats wrong with my MOCpage?
|
| (...) I can't help with the other issues, but this one could be caused by unscrupulous people exploiting the fact that MOCPages doesn't seem to range check the input for voting. I just conducted a quick experiment, by copying the URL the page (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| |
|
url
(score: 0.478)
|
|
| | Whats wrong with my MOCpage?
|
| I've been meaning to do this post for a while now, because I don't know what's going on with my page, and I'm not sure where I should be posting this. Let me clarify that I love and always will love MOCPages, because I think its simply great that I (...) (21 years ago, 20-Dec-04, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish.html, FTX)
| |
|
url
(score: 0.478)
|
|
| | Re: Ferrari
|
| (...) Google finds references of set 8653 as a 2005 unreleased set at: (3 URLs) along with set 8652, Enzo Ferrari 1:17 -Rob. (21 years ago, 16-Dec-04, to lugnet.technic)
| |
|
url
(score: 0.478)
|
|
| | Steel Falcon racer
|
| Maybe this is bad timing, considering all the other issues going on, but hey, here's another MOC for you guys and gals. I've been reading the issues lately, and personally, I don't want to say a darn thing. None of it's really important, only the (...) (21 years ago, 16-Dec-04, to lugnet.space)
| |
|
url
(score: 0.478)
|
|
| | Red Track (was: Say What???)
|
| (...) Hi, I was surprised to have a so great reaction to my pictures of the 9V curved track prototype! I assure that it is not a fake. It is not painted or edited by a computer grafic program. Simple, it is a prototype! Why red? Because Lego usually (...) (21 years ago, 15-Dec-04, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
| |
|
url
(score: 0.478)
|
|
| | Re: Ebay Query
|
| (...) It's sort of a problem with proxy bids. The way eBay enforces a minimum bid increment is that the minimum bid must be the bid increment above the current bid. Unfortunately there really isn't a better way to do it with proxies. Why? Let's say (...) (24 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.market.auction)
| |
|
query
(score: 0.477)
|
|
| | Re: Ebay Query
|
| Say the current price is $7. You bid $10 and are winning. Then while the price is still $7 or so, someone else bids $10.01 and happens to be 1 cent above you, but since the price is currently $7, the min bid is $7.50, and he can bid anything above (...) (24 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.market.auction)
| |
|
query
(score: 0.477)
|
|
| | Ebay Query
|
| Can anyone tell me how people manage to bid 1 cent more than me to win auctions. e.g made_of_stone (2) £10.01 15-Apr-02 19:46:48 BST talltim@hotmail.com (8) £10.00 15-Apr-02 00:10:09 BST talltim@hotmail.com (8) £7.00 09-Apr-02 18:58:58 BST I can't (...) (24 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.market.auction)
| |
|
query
(score: 0.477)
|
|
| | Re: Ebay Query
|
| (...) I believe it has something to do with where the last successful bid sits. e.g. If your max bid is $10.00 and the bid increment is $1.00 and the last successful bid was at $9.01, then a subsequent successful bid would be $10.01 which would (...) (24 years ago, 15-Apr-02, to lugnet.market.auction)
| |
|
query
(score: 0.477)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
