|
| | Re: Datsville Link
|
| (...) Meanwhile, we could replace that dead link with some note saying "Waiting for a new site" or something like that. /Tore (15 years ago, 12-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
| dead (score: 0.712) |
|
| | Some help or advice requested
|
| Hi all. I am currently working on a project (to be revealed in due course!) and I've come across something of a stumbling block. I have a tray that is constrained to move in one dimension, and a series of short liftarms under the tray, all rotating (...) (15 years ago, 19-Jan-10, to lugnet.technic)
| |
| dead (score: 0.710) |
|
| | Re: Instead of ~Moved to
|
| (...) I don't understand what you're saying here, Tore. The ~Moved To files prevent the need to update already existing files by providing a back reference to the old part number. This prevents a part from disappearing from a model simply because (...) (15 years ago, 20-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
| dead (score: 0.710) |
|
| | Re: Some help or advice requested
|
| (...) SNIP I don't think there is a 'save' way to do that. In fact thats the reason reversal switches have dead space, because you will short circuit stuff otherwise (might be only for a millisecond though). I don't know if you ever worked with some (...) (15 years ago, 22-Jan-10, to lugnet.technic)
| |
| dead (score: 0.710) |
|
|
| dead (score: 0.709) |
|
| | Developing a "button pressing" RCX system
|
| Hello, I have inherited a hand-me-down RIS kit with a functional RCX unit that I would like to learn to use and put to a purpose. I would like to build a system whereas the RCX is setup to press buttons on controllers (think remote control units) to (...) (15 years ago, 29-Jan-10, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
| dead (score: 0.709) |
|
| | Re: Some help or advice requested
|
| Here is yet another possible solution that I have found effective for something very similar (a vehicle that reverses its direction when it hits an obstacle). This one is purely mechanical (no electrical switch needed). (2 URLs) The mechanism relies (...) (15 years ago, 31-Jan-10, to lugnet.technic)
| |
| dead (score: 0.708) |
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| LDraw/LCad etc. are not nearly as dead as you think they are! The pioneering days are long gone, and the package of tools has entered the world of "mainstream software". People simply trust everything to work, and will only make themselves known (...) (15 years ago, 14-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
| |
| dead (score: 0.704) |
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| My turn to respond: IMHO LDraw is certainly not dead. In fact here in the Netherlands its is alive and kicking. With me presenting it to the public at LEGOWORLD in Zwolle every October I think there are many users who have joined since 2002 when I (...) (15 years ago, 15-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
| dead (score: 0.703) |
|
| | Re: The future of LDraw?
|
| (...) Timely info! I'm in the middle of filling out LUGNET's (absurdly long) Member sign-up page, hoping to streamline posting... but that's useless & dead? I was going to suggest LUGNET make memberships free, push the donation requests more, change (...) (15 years ago, 16-Mar-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
| dead (score: 0.703) |
|
| | Rechargeable NXT battery DOA?
|
| I ordered the rechargeable battery earlier this week and it arrived yesterday. It appears to be DOA as it does nothing when plugged in amd reads 0v with a multimeter. I am using a 9v regulator from a 9v train set which I have been told will work (...) (15 years ago, 27-Mar-10, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| |
| dead (score: 0.701) |
|
|
| legends (score: 0.693) |
|
| | Re: Using Quad2Dat on Windows Seven 64 bits
|
| (...) Apparently you'll need to email someone who already has it. Meanwhile someone is working on an open source replacement called ldpattern which does have a download available. I don't know what it does yet, but I'd suggest we all give the author (...) (14 years ago, 2-Jun-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
| dead (score: 0.692) |
|
| | LDPattern [DAT]
|
| I just discovered the LDPattern project. (URL) to the ongoing delugnetization, I had no idea it existed until today. Anyway, here are my thoughts. In 1997, I made a DOS program called LDD (=LDraw Draw, to avoid confusion with TLC's Lego Digital (...) (14 years ago, 3-Jun-10, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| |
| dead (score: 0.692) |
|
|
| legends (score: 0.692) |
|
| | 4x2ReVu: 6075 Wolfpack Tower
|
| At first, moving into the charred remains of the haunted Split Spire seemed like a good idea to the small band of thieves. With an already established reputation for being home to the spirit of a long-dead necromancer, few people dare to come near (...) (14 years ago, 18-Jun-10, to lugnet.reviews, FTX)
| |
| dead (score: 0.691) |
|
| | Re: Set 8482
|
| (...) Thanks The robotics Cybermaster group looks dead - nothing for 2 years. I do not have the remote control (RF tower), as I found in the papers and invetory. I dont have time, but I am thinking of taking the elektronics out and building my own. (...) (14 years ago, 27-Jun-10, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.robotics.cybermaster)
| |
| dead (score: 0.690) |
|
|
| dead (score: 0.677) |
|
|
| dead (score: 0.675) |
|
| | Re: Forum shift
|
| (...) Do you really think that adding moderation to a dead forum will revive it? That's the equivalent of trying to bring someone back from a coma by reading them the ten commandments. I'd prefer to stay in the coma than return to that. Tim (14 years ago, 29-Oct-10, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
| |
| dead (score: 0.673) |