Results 1641 – 1660 of about 52000.
|
Search took 0.03 CPU seconds.
|
|
| |
|  
cleaning
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| |
|
old, bricks
(score: 0.881)
|
|
 | | Re: Classic Space Station Rebuild...
|
| (...) snip Progress thus far-- (URL) The major change, besides the extra 5 bricks on the landing pad level, is that he landing pads are now removable for ease of transporation, so hopefully no repeats of this-- (URL) So I have one landing pad (...) (12 years ago, 17-Dec-12, to lugnet.org.ca.obb, FTX)
| |
|
bricks
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| |
|
old
(score: 0.881)
|
|
| |
|
old
(score: 0.880)
|
|
| | Re: Raising a model?
|
| "Dave" <ishakd@optusnet.com.au> wrote in message news:Hp08F2.13zp@lugnet.com... (...) ---...---8<-------- snip (...) I use a latice of 2xX bricks to build up a framework. I have bags of old crummy scratched and pre abs LEGO bricks I have been trying (...) (21 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.castle)
| |
|
old, bricks
(score: 0.880)
|
|
| | Re: Raising a model?
|
| (...) Hi David. (...) Feel free, new threads are good! (...) For me it depends on the moc. Cliffs are pretty easy using BURPs and LURPs. See the current BUB thread for pics of a cliff. (URL) (...) When I have raised a moc I almost never fill in (...) (21 years ago, 27-Nov-03, to lugnet.castle)
| |
|
old, bricks
(score: 0.880)
|
|
| | A new P.A.B. 2X4 Record!
|
| Hey all, A couple of nights ago while trying to maximize the number of 2x4 bricks I could fit into a cup in a far easier format than the previous record. I found that I had actually beat the old record by quite a bit. The new record is 149. (URL) I (...) (21 years ago, 1-Dec-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.announce, FTX)
| |
|
old, bricks
(score: 0.880)
|
|
| |
|
old
(score: 0.880)
|
|
| | 4403 Air Blazers Review
|
| 4403 SYSTEM / Designer Air Blazers Ages 8+, 698 Pcs. (C)2003. 127 page manual: 3 models, 46 primary (5+6+6+11+4+5+8+8+3+...+4+2+4=101 secondary) steps in main model Price Range: $50 USD RATINGS (Scale: Must-Have Excellent Very-Good Good Fair Poor) (...) (21 years ago, 2-Dec-03, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|
old, bricks
(score: 0.880)
|
|
| | How useful Will this Be????
|
| (URL) a new starwars set. That thing the Troopes Rideing sooooo cool.The Alien (forgot name) is awsone. plus sand bricks cups galore and the old school Luke And Obiwon. Danny Vendezzz (21 years ago, 28-Nov-03, to lugnet.castle)
| |
|
old, bricks
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| | Re: Petition against permanent color changes
|
| (...) I recommend we drum up media attention, like what happened when Crayola changed their crayon colors a few years ago. How's this for a headline: LEGO replaces classic "Gray" and "Dark Gray" colors with "Ash" and "Gunmetal". In a cost cutting (...) (21 years ago, 24-Nov-03, to lugnet.general, FTX)
| |
|
old, bricks
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| |
|
old
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| |
|
old
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| |
|
old
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| |
|
old, bricks
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| | Re: New Colors... Smell The Glove
|
| (...) Ah, excellent idea! I should take up smoking to make my new bricks match my old ones! Problem solved! In all seriousness, the color change is not the end of the world. But when I read a message like yours I have to wonder whether you think the (...) (21 years ago, 24-Nov-03, to lugnet.castle)
| |
|
old, bricks
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| | How tall can a LEGO tower get?
|
| How tall can a LEGO tower get? By Ruth Alexander BBC News Dec. 3, 2012 It's not just children who like to build towers with LEGO - the internet is alive with discussion on how many LEGO bricks, stacked one on top of the other, it would take to (...) (12 years ago, 4-Dec-12, to lugnet.mediawatch, lugnet.general, FTX)
| |
|
bricks
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| | Re: The LEGO Company and the North American AFOL
|
| I *never* visit Lugnet any more, but thought I'd pop in, and here you guys are! It's very interesting - over on the SeaLUG email list, we've been having a big discussion about all these changes, and the nature of LEGO fan-dom, fan cons, and whatnot. (...) (12 years ago, 6-Dec-12, to lugnet.general)
| |
|
bricks
(score: 0.879)
|
|
| |
|
old
(score: 0.879)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
