Results 4381 – 4400 of about 136000.
|
Search took 0.07 CPU seconds.
|
|
 | | $10 gift card @ this months rtlToronto meeting
|
| Come one, here ye, come all! cough, As per this deal at out local hang out, (URL) if we order a kids meal, we can get a $10 gift card to TRU. I'm sure there is fine print, but hey we are rtl, we dont roll that way. So, lets see what happens this (...) (15 years ago, 8-Feb-10, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| |
|  
all
(score: 0.520)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.520)
|
|
| | Re: Using MPD syntax in official part files
|
| (...) Sure, doing the right thing in terms of putting the code in the most advantageous location is always worth the effort. (...) Hey, it's all about namespace management, right? As a parts author, I avoid using subfiles unless there is a fairly (...) (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.520)
|
|
| | Re: LPub 4.0.0.4 CLEAR / BUFEXCHG issue
|
| (...) Not yet, although I've seen you can do it. Trying to get the basic instructions and BOM made, then I'll look at all the wizzy extras (like cover pages) LPub 4 is very productive - (URL) - not bad seeing as I only started the layouts last Wed (...) (15 years ago, 9-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.520)
|
|
| | Brick Dice
|
| Hi all, I'm betting there's a fairly large overlap between LEGO-geeks and game-playing-geeks. For that audience I present these "brick dice". Instead of digits 1-6 on the faces, I have building block representations with one to six "studs" showing. (...) (15 years ago, 30-Jan-10, to lugnet.general, lugnet.announce)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.520)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.520)
|
|
| | Re: Using MPD syntax in official part files
|
| (...) I think eliminating part-specific subfiles would be a nice file-management benefit, if nothing else. I expect that reducing the number of part-specific subfiles would speed up the part-approval process, always a good thing. The most important (...) (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.520)
|
|
| | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
| (...) I hadn't thought about this, but I kinda like the idea. The original LDRAW defined values for all color codes, and some of the newer codes were assigned because they are a variation/change from existing colors. The downside of this idea is (...) (15 years ago, 9-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.520)
|
|
| | Re: *** MLCad V3.30 ***
|
| (...) If you have any question regarding this, please don't hesitate to contact me, as I have already made DATHeader using this new feature. (...) Yes, I miss that as they are used in parts already. But others already have answered this question (...) (15 years ago, 11-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.520)
|
|
| | MPD - add all subfiles as submodels
|
| Has anyone written a tool that can append all linetype 1 sub-file references as MPD submodels? Similar to how we sometimes include unofficial parts in the MPD, except recursively adding all needed parts and sub-parts from library. If not, I may hack (...) (15 years ago, 14-Jan-10, to lugnet.cad)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.520)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.520)
|
|
| |
|
rights
(score: 0.520)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.520)
|
|
| |
|
all
(score: 0.520)
|
|
| | Re: *** MLCad V3.30 ***
|
| "Travis Cobbs" <tcobbs@REMOVEgmail.com> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:Kxn3yE.p2D@lugnet.com... (...) So I will take over parts of the build in color table in the range of 256 to 511. During this step the programm will convert these dittered colors (...) (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.520)
|
|
| | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
| (...) There seems to be support for RGB and also for "Dithered" colour out there. The problem that we always faced are caused by applications that do not follow our ideas and so we go limiting our aims. I feel we should stop doing in that way (...) (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.520)
|
|
| | Re: Using MPD syntax in official part files
|
| (...) Well, since the stippling pattern is just an artifact of the printing process, I'd say it's foolish to reproduce it. Some of the dots on the newer stippled gradients are so tiny I can't even see them without a huge magnifier (or maybe I just (...) (15 years ago, 11-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | Re: "Dither" colors in patterned/sticker parts
|
| (...) I stand corrected. However, forcing the user to choose between LDConfig.ldr support and dither color support pretty much makes dither colors useless in MLCad 3.3 for a vast majority of users. (...) That was my original opinion. However, all (...) (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | Re: Using MPD syntax in official part files
|
| (...) Hey, good point. Since we're on the topic of crater plates, I'd like to use this part (URL) to hijack this thread and make an observation about part colors. As you can probably see from the picture, the shark crater plate uses a printed (...) (15 years ago, 10-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
|
| | Re: Using MPD syntax in official part files
|
| (...) In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Don Heyse wrote:> Well, since the stippling pattern is just an artifact of the printing (...) Interesting. Not the response I was expecting. :) Back when I was building the first gradient example for the texture (...) (15 years ago, 11-Feb-10, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
| |
|
all
(score: 0.519)
|
More: Next Page >>
|
