|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 4.073) |
|
| | Re: ------( Terms of use for lugnet.com )------
|
| (...) <snip> About the terms of use... Wow, those are a mouthful, aren't they? USENET doesn't have any. Why should LUGNET? Well, if you read them carefully, you'll see that a lot of thought (and discussion, they've been modified somewhat from the (...) (24 years ago, 22-Oct-00, to lugnet.people.newbie)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 4.073) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 4.068) |
|
| | Is space property?
|
| Howdy and Merry Christmas all, As you probably know, I'm one of the property-rights be-all libertarians here. But I've been fixating on the role of land (or locations) as property. I have talked about the generation of property (e.g. jars of clay) (...) (24 years ago, 25-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 4.068) |
|
| | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| Hi Maggie, This is debate, so that's what we'll do. "Maggie Cambron" <mcambron@pacbell.net> wrote in message... (...) I'm (...) clarification. I disagree. I don't believe anyone's viewpoint will be swayed if we all keep our opinions to ourselves. I (...) (24 years ago, 11-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 4.066) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 4.065) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 4.065) |
|
| | Re: LP POINT 2
|
| (...) Quick answer, for closure. Under a property rights analysis, there is no right to sustenance, per se. There is a right to offer to trade for or pay for or ask for charitiable sustenance but no requirement that anyone in particular actually (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 4.065) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 4.064) |
|
| | Re: From Harry Browne
|
| (...) There are some interesting things to explore here. I agree that a "viability" test is certainly part of the rights based calculus which should be used to evaluate these things. One way to examine the issue is that the unborn baby only has the (...) (24 years ago, 13-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 4.064) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 4.063) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 4.062) |
|
| | Re: IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
|
| (...) Marx said so. (...) It could be argued I exploietd the system could it not - that is your normal perspective. (...) Education is exploitation what a novel way to reduce your tax bill. (...) Why not prosecute all involved? (...) I must be a (...) (24 years ago, 6-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 4.058) |
|
| | Re: LP POINT 1
|
| The usual massive and capricious snippage. (...) I'm not sure I'd agree that the degree of change (since the enlightenment, or more specifically, in the last 20 years) is that small. Certainly it's not as large as I'd wish it but it's a lot more (...) (24 years ago, 28-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 4.057) |
|
| | Re: IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
|
| (...) I have now corrected my spelling. (...) Yes. Naturally, just because it can be copyrighted does not make it right to do so. I think inventions and formulations can be copyrighted/patented to protect investment of time / money otherwise (...) (24 years ago, 30-Nov-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 4.057) |
|
| | Re: Is space property?
|
| Christopher Weeks wrote in message ... (...) believe, (...) seem (...) As an atheist, here is my take on human rights: Rights are, as far as I can tell, a human social construct, a "base-level" set of behavioural rules that originate from (...) (24 years ago, 1-Jan-01, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 4.057) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 4.057) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 4.056) |
|
|
| all, rights, property (score: 4.055) |
|
| | Re: IP ( was Re: LP POINT 1
|
| Now I know exactly what Larry means when saying that all you do is snipe. In your earlier posts, you lured me in by saying enough to trick me into believing that you were interested in talking about it. Now, the best I get is one liners. (...) And (...) (24 years ago, 7-Dec-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| |
| all, rights, property (score: 4.055) |