|
| |
|  
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
 | | RE: Non-volatile memory storage?
|
| Brad, I know in the Mobile robots book they used a Ram chip that had a built in battery back up, whether this would work in the Handyboard (Possible opposing voltage problem), or indeed where you'd get it from. Matt (...) (25 years ago, 2-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| | Re: SMA - shape memory alloys
|
| (...) Si signore :) (...) Non mi riferivo a questo thread in particolare; nessuno ci può proibere di parlare di robotica, se c'è un thread handyboard che non mi risulta sia Lego :) Marco (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| | Re: SMA - shape memory alloys
|
| Mi sembra interessante "Muscle Wires Project Book". Mi sembra + completo di stiquito e dalle immagini, boris, il robot contenuto, mi sembra controllabile via filo, cosa non possibile con stiquito a giudicare dalle recensioni. (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| | Re: SMA - shape memory alloys
|
| 3-133 - Muscle Wires Project Book - $17.95 1 "Stiquito for Beginners : An Introduction to Robotics" James M. Conrad, Jonathan W. Mills; Paperback; @ GBP 20.04 each Non mi pare, se escludiamo le questioni inerenti tasse e spedizione. (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| | Re: SMA - shape memory alloys
|
| (...) Anche il mio RDS ed uno dei DDK, ma occhio alle spese di spedizione: usano UPS e di conseguenza oltre alle tariffe piuttosto salate è sicuro che pagate Dazio (5%) ed IVA (20%) usualmente anche sul trasporto :( Marco (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| | Re: SMA - shape memory alloys
|
| Direi che questo può sembrare la cosa più vicina alla simulazione di questo tipo di robots. Provatelo, a me è piaciuto un sacco: www.sodaplay.com (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| | Re: Short term memory ablut sensor input???
|
| (...) That's not quite right. It is a little bit weard but you can use the counter to detect different states :) In connection with the timer, you can build a simple time dependent variable but only one. Regards Carsten (24 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| | Re: Short term memory ablut sensor input???
|
| (...) That's true. You can't remember something like a light-sensor reading, though. My thinking is: if you're at the point where you want to be doing stuff like this, you're probably ready to graduate to a better system! (24 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| | Re: Short term memory ablut sensor input???
|
| (...) never mind. I've done this once, to prove, that you can build a little robot, which won't get stuck in any kind of corner. Changing strategie, if it detects a corner, in which it was stuck. an programm it only with this kid programming (...) (24 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| | Re: Short term memory ablut sensor input???
|
| Can you remember a touch sensor reading? This way by using only one light sensor as an irpd, I can detect which way to turn to avoid the obstacle. (...) */ (...) turning */ (...) */ (...) travel */ (...) */ (...) ------ (...) */ (...) ------ (...) (...) (24 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| | Re: Memory Usage
|
| (...) Well, I was thinking along the lines of having gcc optimize my program for space instead of speed. Of course, I'd be better off if *I* optimized for space instead of speed, but it can't hurt to have the compiler working for me, if it's (...) (24 years ago, 15-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| | Re: Memory Usage
|
| (...) Ok, thanks. I'll try everything else first, then try this if I get desperate. The main thing I hit a wall with was when I switched to floating-point, which increased my .lx filesize by about 2k, so if I go back to fixed-point, turn sound off (...) (24 years ago, 15-Oct-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
|
| | Memory question
|
| Say I had a program that has a very large block of start-up/calibration code that is run once at the top of the program. Does it make any difference if I keep it in the "Main()" task, or put it in a function? I mean from the point of stack space (...) (19 years ago, 13-Dec-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
|
memory
(score: 1.127)
|
