Subject:
|
Re: Short term memory ablut sensor input???
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.robotics.rcx
|
Date:
|
Thu, 21 Sep 2000 13:54:13 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.{AntiSpam}org
|
Viewed:
|
1555 times
|
| |
|
|
Carsten Müller <spirou@mobile.de> wrote:
> That's not quite right. It is a little bit weard but you can use the
> counter to detect different states :)
That's true. You can't remember something like a light-sensor reading,
though. My thinking is: if you're at the point where you want to be doing
stuff like this, you're probably ready to graduate to a better system!
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Boston University Linux ---> http://linux.bu.edu/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Short term memory ablut sensor input???
|
| (...) never mind. I've done this once, to prove, that you can build a little robot, which won't get stuck in any kind of corner. Changing strategie, if it detects a corner, in which it was stuck. an programm it only with this kid programming (...) (24 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Short term memory ablut sensor input???
|
| (...) That's not quite right. It is a little bit weard but you can use the counter to detect different states :) In connection with the timer, you can build a simple time dependent variable but only one. Regards Carsten (24 years ago, 21-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
