|
| | Re: What I would do (2)
|
| (...) I like this concept, but what if in the case of NQC the new firmware turns out to be such a radically different design that it makes it extremely difficult, if not impossible, to carry over very much of the rather large API built into NQC to (...) (19 years ago, 31-Jan-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
| | Mindstorm "NXT"
|
| Received my "NXT" by UPS on 6/29/2006. Off hand, it appears to me that if a firmware for a mobile phone, using windows XP, is developed for the "NXT" CPU, then I could download my mobile phone pocket pc software and then I could use MS Robot (...) (18 years ago, 3-Jul-06, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
| | Re: Mars mission IV
|
| (...) Interesting approach. Good arguments. 1. The RCX is the device of our choice for this project. 2. I think that the RCX firmware should survey the battery status and more and more disable current-intensive functions. I remember that we were (...) (17 years ago, 11-Mar-08, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
| | RE: time sampling under the rcx standard OS
|
| Here are some comments on how to improve your code for real-time performance. 1. Move the "SetUserDisplay" out of the loop and put it just before the loop. 2. I think the "OnFwd" macro is actually two instructions: "Fwd" and then "On". Replace this (...) (19 years ago, 17-Sep-05, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
| | Re: NQC 2.0 ready for beta test
|
| (...) The topic comes up from time to time. I'm *way* too busy with other projects to extend the firmware, but if someone else wanted to, I'd be willing to extend NQC as needed. If someone else is seriously interested in taking on this work, please (...) (25 years ago, 7-Aug-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
|
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
|
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
|
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
|
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
| | Re: Is there any interest in a tiny scout-like brick?
|
| (...) This sounds really cool! Just to be able to pack all that functionality into a brick that size would be very useful. I'd buy a couple from you for sure. I assume you'd have IR on the thing, so you could always use the remote or commands from (...) (21 years ago, 17-Apr-03, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
| | Re: Using NXT Port 4 EIA-485
|
| (...) They are tiny. #define SIZE_OF_HSBUF 128 typedef struct { UBYTE Buf[SIZE_OF_HSBUF]; UBYTE InPtr; UBYTE OutPtr; UBYTE Spare1; UBYTE Spare2; }HSBUF; // HI Speed related entries HSBUF HsInBuf; HSBUF HsOutBuf; The IOMap hi speed buffer is copied (...) (18 years ago, 10-Apr-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
| |
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
| | Re: inside rcx...
|
| (...) Nope, it's an Hitachi H8/3294. It's an 8-bit microprocessor with 16K of ROM, 512 bytes of SRAM for firmware, and 32K of external SRAM for user code and other applications. Laurentino Martins [(URL) (26 years ago, 2-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
| | Re: legOS problem
|
| I have tried this with brand new batteries.. still the same result.. I am using rcxfirm to send the firmware across to the rcx unit. The download seems to run fine, and ends with a beep from the rcx unit, after this beep the rcx unit shuts down and (...) (26 years ago, 26-Dec-98, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
| | RE: NQC 1.2 in beta testing
|
| Well, those are still cool new functions...I will keep wishing the RCX firmware allowed runtime evaluations instead of constants. Maybe LegOS does...does anyone know? Rich (URL) Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com (...) (26 years ago, 22-Feb-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
| | Re: Power Supply
|
| Not necessarily so, there is some residual capacity. I have replaced batteries in the past without loosing firmware or programs by flipping out the old, and inserting the new within a couple of seconds. (25 years ago, 2-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
| | Re: show-me training
|
| Hi, This is a great idea. I was just wondering if you meant to make a replacment firmware to accomplish this or just write a program? I would be extremely interested in this project. Thanks Nicolas Gauthier (25 years ago, 8-Sep-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
| | RCX2: ViewSourceValue Help
|
| Hi, I'm back after a break from Lego. (I had exams). I've been playing around with RCX2 firmware and want to use the new ViewSourceValue command. What is the correct asm for this. So far I've got this by guessing and looking at RCX2.NQH #define (...) (24 years ago, 24-Apr-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
| |
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
|
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
| | Re: Extra RAM
|
| I was just thinking that with more room, you could have full-fledged versions of software, and with limited firmware, you could have super huge arrays that could be used to store data in very high resolutions(like a map for navigation). Andy (...) (24 years ago, 27-May-00, to lugnet.robotics)
| |
| firmware (score: 1.777) |
|
| | Re: Communicatin between NQC and legOS
|
| (...) you won't be able to use LNP - those packets are completely different from the Lego firmware ones. You'll need to write bytes directly to the serial port (I'm not sure what support there is for this in legOS since once you start munging the (...) (24 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
| |
| firmware (score: 1.777) |