To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
To LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
  *9698 (-5)
  Re: WOW Quit here
 
(...) I will be heading by there again today, and will double-check. I probably did not notice them because of relative disinterest in those sets. But hey, at $5, that is a pretty good deal. The Mindstorms are on the opposite side of the store, in (...) (27 years ago, 6-Nov-98, to lugnet.loc.us.az.phx)
 
  Re: Clear plastic "tackle boxes"
 
(...) Wouldn't that be LC^M (1) complete? (1) - where the ^M means complete multiple times (2) (2) - How many shuttles again in your fleet? (...) (27 years ago, 6-Nov-98, to lugnet.storage)
 
  Re: A better boxcar? (was: Re: Thanks to Terry Cruse and Ali V.
 
Ben Fleskes writes: For the longest time I wanted to be 9v complete. Then I finally asked (...) I must agree with Ben -- and this might be a little more blunt. As much of a LEGO trainhead that I am, I find it difficult to justify building a shrine (...) (27 years ago, 6-Nov-98, to lugnet.trains)
 
  Re: Building gcc
 
(...) I wonder if this is the step I was missing. After following Allen's instructions, I ran into troubles with an include directory missing files, so I just created empty files and the compilation complete fine. Maybe using crossgcc fills in those (...) (27 years ago, 6-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)
 
  Building gcc
 
After some agony, I've discovered that the instructions for building a gcc cross-compiler miss out a vital step (probably because its one of those things that's so obvious to people who regularly build cross-compilers that they forget they've done (...) (27 years ago, 6-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR