|
|
 | | Re: lugnet.belville has got on it's feet!
|
| Suzanne D. Rich wrote in message ... (...) set.. (...) their (...) in (...) which (...) with (...) too (...) to (...) some (...) also (...) He he he... Yea, I've played around a bit with swapping body parts. (...) call (...) Yea, that is a dramatic (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.belville, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Proposal for new Mgazine. ATTN: Mr B. Justus
|
| (...) I have to agree with Allan. If there is any reason for a 2nd edition, it should be based on language, and not geography. (A German or French version?). I also think that this magazine would be a great way to showcase some of the historic (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: Regolamento.
|
| (...) :-))) (...) Aggiungerei: 5) non deve essere "perso" nessun pezzo strada facendo 6) non possono essere usate rampe di lancio 7) il sensore di luminosita` deve costituire un corpo unico con l'RCX (se qualcuno e` cosi` bravo da riuscire a (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
| | | | | Re: WB store sale
|
| If anybody hasn't made their purchases yet, or is going back for more, take a second to join up at ebates.com. You get a 6% rebate. And, as noted in Larry's sig, say Larry sent you and Lugnet gets some cash as well. Larry too. Larry, didja remember (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.shopping)
| | | | | Re: trade value of an RCX?
|
| I think it would be a bit much to trade for - a person would have to add a TON of bricks, pushing the shipping costs for the box skyhigh, or add a complete set or 2. And if it was a 1.0 RCX brick, it would be worth even more. Why don't you just (...) (25 years ago, 17-Jan-00, to lugnet.market.jambalaya)
|
|
