 | | Re: NQC 2.1 b2 in beta test
|
|
(...) I remember discussing this briefly, but I don't think we ever came up with a final "spec" for the feature. Here are the issues I forsee: 1) The IR tower times out. NQC should probably do something to keep it alive - and that "something" should (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: looking for yellow half arch 1x5x4
|
|
(...) Thanks for the info. Set #6276 is a great looking set which I don't have. I was never into Pirates very much, and this came out in 1989 which was the year I started my dark ages and sold all my LEGO when I went off to college. I need these for (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: Do you build sets you buy for parts?
|
|
I have purchased some sets for their parts from resellers. (Don't tell me, let me guess, some of you have, too!) In some instances those sets were not NIB -- usually at my request, as I would rather save shipping costs than receive a box that I'll (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.1 b2 Linux binaries + rpm (was Re: NQC 2.1 b2 in beta test)
|
|
(...) Go right ahead. Dave Baum (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
| |
| | Re: NQC 2.1 b2 in beta test
|
|
(...) that to (...) I don't see any reason why you wouldn't be able to copy the beta version of NQC on top of the one RcxCC normally invokes. I suspect Mark will update RcxCC shortly after 2.1 becomes final. Dave (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.nqc)
|
