 | | Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets
|
|
(...) Maybe my hopes were too high. Compare to (URL) for example -- the Lego design is way too stubby and lumpy compared to the long, sleek "real" X-wing. (27 years ago, 3-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: I'm baaaack!
|
|
What timing! I live near S. Boulder & S. Public. Unfortunately, I am just getting ready to move. My wife wants me to put my LEGOs into storage. I'll have to save a couple of boxes of choice pieces so that I don't go nuts during the transition. (...) (27 years ago, 3-Nov-98, to lugnet.loc.us.co.den)
|
| |
| | Re: Cool robot platform and a question...
|
|
Clem, In a message dated 98-11-03 01:04:33 EST, you write: << I started probing around for continuity to try and figure out what's what and I didn't get very far. >> This is the right place to start. If you can see the circuit traces, copy them to a (...) (27 years ago, 3-Nov-98, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
|
| |
| | Re: Thoughts on 1999 sets
|
|
(...) I like the X-wing design. I think it is quite well done. I can see it will need some modification for retractable landing gear, though. So does the Y-wing. I think the Y-wing is the best design of the ships they show. I like the TIE fighter (...) (27 years ago, 3-Nov-98, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: LUGnet historical moment -- (was: Got 1999 mini catalog!)
|
|
(...) I've certainly done the same as well. For awhile things got too busy at work for me to have time to keep up with RTL. Then lugnet came online, and I basically stopped going to RTL. I much prefer the way lugnet is organized. (27 years ago, 3-Nov-98, to lugnet.general, lugnet.admin.general)
|
