 | | Re: Is the tower piece new?
|
|
(...) Nice theory. How'd you come up with it? -Shiri (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: 8445 - Gone!!!
|
|
(...) Really? Wow, quick. That's a nice set, too. (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO trademark (was: Re: What I did for the Y2K weekend...[lego phone])
|
|
(...) Leading to meetings out of which come concepts like "Dove is not soap", I'm sure. (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Return to Lego!
|
|
"Marco Beri" <marcob@equalis.it> wrote in message news:38714e35.615865...net.com... Ci risiamo con i post notturni...... -- Cheers Carlo. LUGNET member page: (URL) member of ItLUG: (URL) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO trademark (was: Re: What I did for the Y2K weekend...[lego phone])
|
|
(...) A quandry for marketing, I'm sure. Legal keeps saying "No, Foobrand does not equal barproduct!", while the advertising folks are trying to convince people exactly the opposite. (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
