|
|
 | | Re: 8001 Battle Droid is awesome!
|
| (...) Does your reply, Tony, mean that you have a Destroyer Droid? If so, I think you're the first Lugneteer to to get one. All I have seen so far is second hand reports that say some other website reports that some guy saw some on shelves, etc. (...) (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Schronization Problems
|
| Hello all, I'm going to add to the list of HB that no longer work after not using it for about 1 month. I have included the listing from IC below, but here's some additional info. The board goes into bootstrap fine. Both lights go out and then the (...) (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.handyboard)
| | | | | Brad - TLC needs to minimize packaging
|
| Brad, I've gotten a few "special" sets, 1775 and 2149 in particular, that are densely packed in order to take up as little storage space as possible. It would be nice if TLC would start to package ALL of their sets this way. Almost all of the 1999 (...) (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
| | | | | Re: 8001 Battle Droid is awesome!
|
| On Tue, 28 Dec 1999, Hari Wiguna (<FnFszs.Jnt@lugnet.com>) wrote at 06:10:46 (...) Pretty much the same, although more complex and less robust. (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: New Castle Sucks (so far...)
|
| On Mon, 27 Dec 1999, Richard Marchetti (<FnEyty.98r@lugnet.com>) wrote at 19:15:34 (...) That depends. (...) This is a very AFOL oriented view. If you look at it as a toy for a young person, it has to be playable when finished. And by and large, the (...) (25 years ago, 28-Dec-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
|
