 | | variation of that OTA model of HOW M.'s [DAT]
|
|
similar but yet different more "frame" to it 0 Load & haul RR gondola wagon 0 Name: m4563c.dat 0 Author: thomas burger (tburger666@aol.com) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 3020.DAT 1 0 0 0 -70 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 3021.DAT 1 0 0 0 70 0 0 1 0 1 0 -1 0 0 (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.dat.models)
|
| |
| | Re: CLSOTW voting
|
|
(...) I think people should be able to give fractional votes: You get 1.0 "voting points" to spread out however you want among the sites. You might give 30% to one and 70% to another, for example. --Todd (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | linux-lnp: select() vs. SIGIO ( was Re: Call for debugging support )
|
|
(...) Uuh, there was a little bug in my test program. Once again, i learned i have to read gcc´s warnings carefully. On linux, select() suffers exactly the same thing as SIGIO. If the hardware fifo of the uart is enabled, and there is a stream of (...) (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: CLSOTW voting
|
|
(...) Of course it doesn't. (...) You weren't listening. Go back and read what I wrote again. --Todd (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: CLSOTW voting
|
|
(...) The queue is pretty long. There are actually so many totally outstanding sites that the non-totally-outstanding sites don't stand a chance. But that's kind of the whole point -- the showcase the most outstanding stuff. --Todd (25 years ago, 20-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
