 | | Re: Fair Play (was Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs)
|
|
<SNIP> (...) But if it *wasn´t* available through www.lego.com, then, linking to it would be a violation, right? So, if LEGO makes a new "fair play" document and keeps the old one, then would I be allowed to link to it? All this is somewhat (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: Two points for a European Legofest
|
|
(...) Hi Ardjan, Your are good points. And these are the reasons for Richard is keeping a list of the possible attendees. When we'll have some more info about the number and location of the coming AFOLs, we'll be in a better position to decide where (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.eu)
|
| |
| | Re: Catalogs, Justus and Lego
|
|
Doh! NLP means Non-Lego Parent. Will Visit the Lego Beach Fire and Rescue Service (URL) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: MLCad wishlist (was Re: Ice Cream
|
|
Ok my friends, whats up now ... 1) The color requester: Beside the problem of not beeing compatible to LDraw for the moment how do you like the new color box and dialogs? 2) The compatibility problem will be solved with the next version which should (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.cad.mlcad)
|
| |
| | Re: Catalogs, Justus and Lego
|
|
(...) of (...) I'll put my .02 in... (...) sets (...) sets (...) The economic sense is that if you can acquire parts in bulk (and I mean really obscene amounts here) you could undercut TLC's pricing and still make a decent profit. (...) This is (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
