| | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors)
|
|
I still can't quite understand why it is so important to get sensors out of the standard listing. Aren't robots 33% sensors and 33% actuators and 33% software (rounded to the nearest 33%)? Confused ... JB ----- Original Message ----- From: Todd (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
|
| | Re: Opions on the 4561
|
|
(...) Do what my wife did. Buy another set. Then carefully cut the train numbers and you get two more cars and a caboose! Dean (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
|
| | Re: Ritocchi al sito ItLUG
|
|
(...) (URL) sapevate che se usiamo le GIF ci tocca pagare? Ciao. Marco. (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.loc.it)
|
|
| | Re: Robotics subgroups by mail (was: sensors)
|
|
(...) I would think the support of Michael Gasperi and Brian Stormont would be important here, since this would be moving a certain amount of traffic down to a lower level rather than creating new traffic from scratch (where there is no loss but (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
| | Re: Cool Y2K set observations
|
|
(...) Plain ordinary TRANS-YELLOW (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|