 | | Re: "If it were my toy company..."
|
|
More of my two cents.... I think this makes about 4 1/2 cents so far: (...) time (...) So long as this were the Rock Raiders sets.... then things would improve in two ways. Regards, Allan (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Re: "If it were my toy company..."
|
|
Here's my two cents on the whole thing: (...) Why not simply substitute for newer parts. Great thing about LEGO is that it's entirely modular. (sarcastic remark, I apologize in advance.) Put another way.... if need be they could easily redesign a (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Raised Baseplates, good or bad?
|
|
Hi all, I guess my subject says it all. Are all these raised baseplates good or bad? Personally, I prefer the original flat baseplates... All personal creations using the new raised baseplates require the use those 2x1x3 inverted slopes which gets (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Dear Lego...
|
|
Dear Lego... I only have a small number of wants: 1) More train cars: Such as twin tankers, blue hoppers, etc. 2) A new train crossing 3) A new airport: something like Century Skyway would be nice; could call it Millenium Skyway heh. 4) Revive the (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
| |
| | Fantasy sets! (was Re: Horrible quote from the Scala web catalog)
|
|
And to reply to myself (losing it...)... Let's bring up the OTHER Fantasy stuff discussed before. Dragons - gimme a break. The current ones are TOO SMALL. Bring out dragon SETS - bricks/slopes/plates/tiles to build a *DRAGON* - i.e. 100ft scale (...) (25 years ago, 14-Dec-99, to lugnet.dear-lego)
|
