 | | Re: LEGO trains...The Future of Model Railroading?
|
|
(...) If you were sensing any "hostility" it was just a little bit. :^) The "come off it phrase" is like saying "give me a break". While reading my last comment you must imagine me grinning and speaking sarcastically. That's just my way of replying (...) (26 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO trains...The Future of Model Railroading?
|
|
Jim Rorstrom wrote in message ... (...) junk. (...) a (...) at (...) the (...) Well, the cost depends very much on whether you require all the scenery to be LEGO pure. The GMLTC layout would be far more expensive to create than a similar quality HO (...) (26 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Clone DATs--any interest?
|
|
(...) Count me in the minority, then. Making parts is hard. If someone wants to make parts I say more power to them. Perhaps making clone parts will refine their modeling skill, which has to be a good thing for all of us. I understand the issues but (...) (26 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO trains...The Future of Model Railroading?
|
|
(...) I'd agree with Jim here too. Even in the 'live steam' scales, the cost of modeling something in relation to the space it takes up is relatively constant. The average is $2-3 an hour for the hobby of model railroading. That's not to say that (...) (26 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: LEGO for Life Sweepstakes
|
|
(...) I'll second that, Peter (hope the toenail recovers quickly) hey what about starting a petition, which we could send to Lego Australia, asking that WE are also provided for stamping foot( I want an Australian Shop @ Home!!!!) After waiting with (...) (26 years ago, 24-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego, lugnet.loc.au)
|
