 | | Re: Could Arctic windows = ATAT windows?
|
|
I wouldn't be surprised if this turns out to be the case. The MF is MUCH smaller than it should be, especially the cockpit. I think it's reasonable to assume the AT-AT will also be scaled down in this way. Dave (...) course (...) actual (...) (give (...) (26 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
 | | Re: Slave 1 Cockpit
|
|
There's also a trans-antifreeze one in Mtron #6956. I really wish they'd make one in trans-green! Opaque blue and white would be great too. Dave Joel Hoornbeek <joel@webaccess.net> wrote in message news:FL1pwF.Bx5@lugnet.com... (...) there (...) (...) (26 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
 | | Re: What is pictured in the inset by the MF on page 8?
|
|
No, I think I figured it out. It is a hand. Ever see the CD Lego catalog in the Turbo Command set. This hand comes out and does the stuff to the models to show what it does. I think this hand had some kind of Borg looking contraption on it. The pic (...) (26 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
 | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
Steve: (...) [...] (...) ...with the inversion status. (...) Yes. You might want to change "INVERT" to "INVERTNEXT". Play well, Jacob ---...--- -- E-mail: sparre@cats.nbi.dk -- -- Web...: <URL:(URL) -- ---...--- (26 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
 | | Re: Line in the Sand
|
|
[ Still discussing (URL) ] Steve: (...) [...] (...) "INVERTNEXT" is good. It makes the effect much more clear. (...) It gets much too messy when you mix the states of a parameter and the setting of that parameter. CERTIFY BFC does imply CLIPPING ON, (...) (26 years ago, 11-Nov-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|