 | | Re: Millennium Falcon close-up! (was: Re: Sorry to spoil it KL, but 2000 catalog posted!)
|
|
(...) Ah, cool. Thanks! All I wanted to know... Strange feature to include, if you ask me. 'Specially since it was never SEEN in the movies (mentioned...). That was my first impression of it, too... Oh, well. Maybe I'll be lucky this thanksgiving (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
|
(...) ~ LOL!! cow-pack! i love it! i won't be able to call 'em anything but! they're surely not ninja though. definitely european villains for the knights. later ~ craig (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Train Windows
|
|
I'm not so sure they are gray... look at the caption picture that shows the action shot of the minifig kicking a ball. Those look white :-( Maybe Kevin can clarify for us, but I'm not optimistic. They look gray in the one shot but it is shadowed and (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon close-up! (was: Re: Sorry to spoil it KL, but 2000 catalog posted!)
|
|
I tried a 300dpi of page 8 and you still can't really make out the action box. My best guess is that it is an escape pod coming out the back. My scanner isn't the sharpest as you can see. KL (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | One good town set for 2000 (maybe?)
|
|
6600 looks like it has pretty good vehicles, and the first raised road plates! I hope they sell them seperate (probably not...). Page 26, BTW. And if you don't have the site by now it's (URL) :) -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=...=-=-=-=-=- jmbrown@mines.edu (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2000 Scans are Online!
|
|
Jason Brown wrote in message <38273E75.5BDE6C8D@m...es.edu>... (...) I feel the same way. There is no way to beat the ones I have seen. I noticed the single person cockpit also. As was the case with you, I too am now disappointed in the MF. All (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2000 Scans are Online!
|
|
(...) That does sound like really good news - I assume these are pretty much the first Lego sets for which the suggested age range is basically an adult range. What puzzles me though is *why* they are marked as from 16. They don't look especially (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
|
(...) Are those Ninja or "Cow-pack" (like Wolfpack, but with that steer emblem). They look kinda European to me, like a band of bad guys to put your new Knight's Kingdom castle under seige. That swords don't look very ninja. I think I'll just call (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
|
(...) I assumed those were more castle - the enemy for the Knights to vanquish :) But if it works in Castle *and* Ninja themes then all the cooler! Richard (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon close-up! (was: Re: Sorry to spoil it KL, but 2000 catalog posted!)
|
|
(...) Good deal Kevin, that helps a bit on judging the MF... but I'd still like a close up of 8 of the Falcon, and maybe the A-Wing, please. Both have strange things going on in the cartoony pictures above their set pictures. Or if you can just (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon close-up! (was: Re: Sorry to spoil it KL, but 2000 catalog posted!)
|
|
(...) it's supposed to be... it's on page 8. Looks like something big falling out of it or something... :/ Although the new close up of page 12 adds insight into the model... only 1 minifig in the cockpit, looks like. (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: Ninja vs. "real" Castle (was: Re: More news on 2000 lineup!)
|
|
(...) ^^^...^^^ RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!!! Mike's on the loose!!!!! (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.castle)
|
| |
| | Re: More news on 2000 lineup!
|
|
(...) Hey, wait! There *are* more Ninja sets: (URL) more! --Todd (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2000 Scans are Online!
|
|
(...) LOL! That Han is such a little rascal! Richard (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Millennium Falcon close-up! (was: Re: Sorry to spoil it KL, but 2000 catalog posted!)
|
|
heh, try page 12a... KL (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 2000 Scans are Online!
|
|
(...) Hmm... no I didn't. I don't think they've ever done 16 or above before! Wow. :) Finally some recognition of older LEGO fans. Um, expesive, LOTS of pieces. Hmmm... Kevin posted a close up of the Falcon (not from the page I wanted, but good (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 2000 Scans are Online!
|
|
I just added c00am-12a.jpg, a 300dpi close up of the MF It doesn't exactly fit on the page like the rest of the scans, but oh well. KL (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Making Fake Pieces?
|
|
(...) Another fan of large projects (and there are quite a few these days :) As a LEGO purist I cannot condone the mutilation of LEGO parts in model construction, but it is your LEGO, and farbeit for me to tell you what to do with it. I can offer (...) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Millennium Falcon close-up! (was: Re: Sorry to spoil it KL, but 2000 catalog posted!)
|
|
(...) There's a big closeup on page 12! (URL) (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Re: 2000 Scans are Online!
|
|
Jason Brown wrote in message <382739DC.77E70887@m...es.edu>... (...) :) Anyway, (...) Did you notice the age on the "Ultimate Collector's Series" from 16 years? Has Lego listed an age 16 or above? They look expensive to me... (25 years ago, 9-Nov-99, to lugnet.general)
|
