 | | Re: Bigger/better scans of 2000 sets?
|
|
(...) Gaah! Why quibble over Semantics? ;) I generally use the overhead footprint when determining names. Besides, no one name is right. I did put in the part number, ya know. (...) Umm... Sorry, it is *not* part 6081. It does *not* have the (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | Hapless WinNT user
|
|
That's me, trying to use legOS 0.2.2 on WinNT with CygWin. I'm using the same tools that worked for me for legOS 0.1.7. Make complains when it tries to build dll, specifically when it tries to compile loader.c. I get a bunch of redefined symbols and (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
| | Re: Does anyone actually still use theirs??
|
|
(...) It makes a good addition if you only have one RCX. You can use it to do some of the simple reactive behavior in order to save sensor and motor slots on the RCX - a scarce resource indeed. Søren Bak (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics.codepilot)
|
| |
| | Re: Look at this orange car
|
|
(...) That's a nice little gondola. It looks like those parts come from the Scala set 3110 Four Animal Friends (which comes with one of them and costs USD 7.00 from S@H). No if only there would be a matching wall section so that one could make a (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: images of Mindstorms LEGO parts
|
|
I've reproduced the Constructopedia 1.0, including the parts list page, at (URL) may be some other sources, as far as I know. Enjoy. --Doug Wilcox -----Original Message----- From: Mulampaka, Kalyan (GEIS, ASI) <Kalyan.Mulampaka@geis.ge.com> To: (...) (25 years ago, 8-Nov-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
