 | | RE: new pieces (was Re: Wot no RCX power connector?)
|
|
(...) I wasn't sure that Kekoa had ever admitted to being amazed, so I had a look over at the links above. Now I know what he is talking about. <snip> I assume you are amazed at the new anti-gravity levitating brick at the bottom of picture 3. I (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Interesting interpretation of "new in box"
|
|
(...) Hm, I wonder if it's worth raising a stink with eBay. Both of these are clearly misrepresentations. New in Box should not have a picture of a set in a plastic baggie and no sign of the box. Mint should clearly not be a set which is missing (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.theory)
|
| |
| | Re: I was in asda at the weekend...
|
|
(...) What is the set number of the technic future car? Ian Bishop, Ayrshire, UK (25 years ago, 19-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
|
| |
| | Re: Busy-Bee has 6347 Monorail Accessory Track!
|
|
On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Mike Stanley (<slrn80rf16.5fj.cjc...s.utk.edu> ) wrote at 12:42:52 (...) The current availability of older discontinued sets in limited quantities is due to the reorganisation of TLG in Europe, I believe. Some warehouses are (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | RE: new pieces (was Re: Wot no RCX power connector?)
|
|
(...) I wasn't sure that Kekoa had ever admitted to being amazed, so I had a look over at the links above. Now I know what he is talking about. If this is the potential for "Constructopedia" type books, then there is a very high level of art (...) (25 years ago, 20-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
|
