|
| | Re: Tower Building Trial
|
| On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Scott-A (<FJAAsw.Fr3@lugnet.com>) wrote at 12:31:31 (...) I think first time round I'm more interested in impressiveness. We don't want to push the envelope when we'd have to sort out whose was what if it collapses. If we can do (...) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | Re: Tower Building Trial
|
| On Thu, 7 Oct 1999, Liam Parnell (<Pine.LNX.4.04.9910....5242-1000 00@ukonline.co.uk>) wrote at 18:44:08 (...) Definitely possible on the day, then :-) (...) Err. Why? (...) Yeah. I was in a quandary about this. Perhaps another size might be an idea (...) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | Re: Tower Building
|
| On Fri, 8 Oct 1999, Lawrence Wilkes (<FJAKM4.8DK@lugnet.com>) wrote at 16:03:40 (...) Let's not try to run before we can walk :-) Apart from anything else, we'd struggle to get a crane! Everyone who is coming to the fest in December is cordially (...) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.loc.uk)
| | | | Re: KB KIDS.com 20% Off sale (and 50% clearance items, more importantly)
|
| (...) You can always use it again - either under your name or under someone else's. (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.market.shopping)
| | | | Re: !!! Laser attachments for Mindstorms !!!
|
| (...) Rangefinding can be done without much of this hassle. I developed an application a few years ago to "showcase" a product for the optoelectric company for which I worked. The product was a "position sensitive diode", aka a photodiode with two (...) (25 years ago, 8-Oct-99, to lugnet.robotics)
| |