|
|
 | | Re: New starwars sets.
|
| Well, I for one am glad they are continuing the Star Wars line, even if the MF is out of scale and so on. If it has a large assortment of bricks and so on, as the other Classic sets and EP1 sets do, I will be very happy indeed. Now, here's hoping to (...) (25 years ago, 7-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: New Star Wars Stuff
|
| (...) From what I can tell, the Gungan Sub is *WAY* bigger than it "should" be. eric (25 years ago, 7-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: New Star Wars Stuff
|
| (...) I'd have to agree... also, bear in mind that a Falcon the size of an X-Wing is still a lot bigger than the X-Wing just in terms of pieces, etc., since it's a lot more bulky, and doesn't have real 'wings' or a thin body... But usually, the toy (...) (25 years ago, 7-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
| | | | | Re: Lego Article (Re: I'm famous (or infamous))
|
| (...) WSJ recently (last december) ran an article on Mindstorms, titled "Lego's Robot Set for Kids Grabs Crowds of Grown-Ups". Front page of the second section. I doubt they're likely to run a similar article again soon, unless something really (...) (25 years ago, 7-Oct-99, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: New Star Wars Stuff
|
| (...) That would have been an unforgivable error were it not for the fact I like Lego more than Star Wars. Whoops. Maybe I should go back to lurking here and dreaming of grey bricks.... (...) same here :: paul (25 years ago, 7-Oct-99, to lugnet.starwars)
|
Skipped 2 messages in
groups
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.off-topic.fun (Skip-filter settings)
|
