|
|
 | | Re: New angled beam
|
| (...) No, I would guess they are 135°. (I said 45° in my original post, but I really meant 135°, sorry.) The old part 6629 (nine holes) has a pretty odd angle, 143.13°. (...) Yep, it's the 32140 "five hole one bend" beam, with this basic shape: o + (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: Will buy 6396
|
| (...) No. emailing it benefits you and no one else, so I prefer to post the answer... Follow this link: (URL) which you could have find yourself using the LUGNET search facility and the search string "CS IJ". LUGNET has a lot of neat stuff and you (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade)
| | | | | Re: So?
|
| (...) Suzanne is checking the availability of space at MIT. I think she is trying to get us in next Tuesday but nothing is confirmed as of yet. Eric Remove ".nospam" when replying by E-mail The New England LEGO Users Group (URL) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.loc.us.ma.bos)
| | | | | Re: New angled beam
|
| Fredrik Glöckner <fredrik.glockner@bio.uio.no> wrote in message news:m33dw8o454.fsf@....uio.no... (...) Yes, sorry. The Droid Development Kit. (...) I have to say that I didn't notice that! I am at work at the moment, but I'll double check the (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.technic)
| | | | | Re: DAT format question
|
| Gary Williams: (...) [...] (...) Then give the user a _choice_ of interface. (...) I would limit command types 2-5 to the "extended interface". (...) The selected object would of cause (imo) always be the level referred directly to by the root level (...) (25 years ago, 22-Sep-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Skipped 1 message in
group
lugnet.off-topic.fun (Skip-filter settings)
|
