 | | Re: When should the 2000 Catalogue Appear?
|
|
(...) To, dammit. That's a typo, not a misused word, I swear. (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: When should the 2000 Catalogue Appear?
|
|
(...) [snip] (...) Looks like I beat you too this by ten seconds. :) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: When should the 2000 Catalogue Appear?
|
|
(...) Of course, the first LEGO catalog of the millennium won't be till next year. 2000 is the _last_ year of the century/millennium, all the zeros not withstanding. (We don't count years the same way we count birthdays; we count birthdays by the (...) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: When should the 2000 Catalogue Appear?
|
|
Sanjay D'Souza wrote in message ... (...) catalogue....I (...) The 21st century, 3rd millenium, and the next decade begin in 2001, not 2000 :) (since there was no year "zero", the first year of the first era/millennium/century/decade is xxx1 AD, (...) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Current Town Projects
|
|
(...) haven't (...) people (...) At lot of the trains people are really just 'townies' in disguise, look at many of the train sites and you will see just as much 'town' as you will 'train'. I'm going to spend the winter working on a bookshelf town (...) (25 years ago, 21-Sep-99, to lugnet.town)
|
