 | | Re: 8263 Snow Groomer Review
|
|
(...) You mean 8865 right? But yeah I agree, and I had found them actually very simple to follow. The only instances where old school instructions were difficult were the early 853 auto chassis (the plates in the blue engine) and all the tubing for (...) (17 years ago, 11-Jul-09, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: 8263 Snow Groomer Review
|
|
(...) You mean 8865 right? But yeah I agree, and I had found them actually very simple to follow. The only instances where old school instructions were difficult were the early 853 auto chassis (the plates in the blue engine) and all the tubing for (...) (17 years ago, 11-Jul-09, to lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: WeDo +RCX?
|
|
(...) You are correct---there is a tilt sensor and a distance sensor value available in the sensor value block. These get shown even if the motor blocks are not being shown, so I don't know why I missed them before. The values are 0 if no WeDo (...) (17 years ago, 11-Jul-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: WeDo +RCX?
|
|
(...) I saw a "WeDo 2 Puppet" project on the Scratch website that specifically mentions the use of the tilt senso so I suppose it must be possible to use sensors as well. "The scratch project uses the tilt sensor to decide when they spin" Jetro (17 years ago, 11-Jul-09, to lugnet.robotics.rcx)
|
| |
| | Re: 8263 Snow Groomer Review
|
|
(...) The juniorization (or simplification to a level of near brain dead builders) of the building instructions is a whole new area for discussion and one that can certainly generate a lot of comments in both directions. Some would say it may have (...) (17 years ago, 11-Jul-09, to lugnet.technic)
|
