|
|
 | | Does everyone live in the Pac NW? (besides Sandlin)
|
| Hi Ben, Another person in the right neighborhood. Odd how that works. LFB (17 years ago, 24-Jun-09, to lugnet.loc.us.or, lugnet.loc.us.or.eug)
| | | | | Re: Oh man.
|
| (...) The ship is still in existence. Rubbermaid actually now makes a bin that's something like 55 gallons, which can actually hold sections. But yeah, transportation sucked. (...) Aw, rats, I cannot remember our roller bearing discussion relative (...) (17 years ago, 24-Jun-09, to lugnet.loc.us.or, lugnet.loc.us.or.eug, FTX)
| | | | | Re: 8879 no more?
|
| (...) I had the train reverse on me too, but it was only when the speed was close to zero. So, I assumed I had just clicked twice, and gone from +1 to -1. The issue about losing signals due to line-of-site communication has another side to it. If (...) (17 years ago, 24-Jun-09, to lugnet.trains)
| | | | | Re: LD4DStudio sample suggestions
|
| (...) Thanks, actually I did cheat a bit. I made sure the cylinder heads are perpendicular to the crankShaft. With that in place the motion comes down to fairly basic geometry. First step is to calculate the pistonRound angle by reducing the whole (...) (17 years ago, 24-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad)
| | | | | Re: LD4DStudio sample suggestions
|
| (...) The linear portion of the crank is easy enough (rotation around fixed axis). But the connecting rods have to have one end stay connected to the crank and the other end stay coincident with the axis of a cylinder. This means they need both an (...) (17 years ago, 24-Jun-09, to lugnet.cad, FTX)
|
Skipped 3 messages in
group
lugnet.admin.statistics (Skip-filter settings)
|
