 | | Re: Frustration with NXT-G 1.1
|
|
Very good points, Brian. Because I'm accustomed to thinking in more "standard" programming structures, I have a tendency to try to make "the G" behave the same way it would as if I were working in Java, etc. It would be much more efficient to (...) (16 years ago, 13-May-08, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Frustration with NXT-G 1.1
|
|
By the way, I was able to work around the main problem I was having (conditional loop termination didn't work) by building in a STOP block. I was able to going to have to recreate the nested if-then statements into one string of if-then blocks. It's (...) (16 years ago, 13-May-08, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Frustration with NXT-G 1.1
|
|
(...) Please let your wife know that she has *really* cool tastes in anniversary gifts :). (...) I still like it quite a bit, but it seems among adults I'm a minority (or an aberration... I've been called worse). I agree that the bugs in the IDE in (...) (16 years ago, 13-May-08, to lugnet.robotics)
|
| |
| | Re: Help writing LDraw's history
|
|
(...) Jean-Marc came back to me today with an interesting solution I think might work. See (URL) Click on MLCad's ball, then "Details" within the window. The specific versions will appear in the large band below. What does everyone think about this? (...) (16 years ago, 13-May-08, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Frustration with NXT-G 1.1
|
|
Given the frustrations I've had, I can't agree with the "10/10" ease of use rating that the BotMag comparison ( (URL) ) gave NXT-G. However, it does show that RobotC is, apparently, twice as easy to use as NXJ and NXC; that might be enough for me. (...) (16 years ago, 13-May-08, to lugnet.robotics)
|
