 | | Re: Waterborne offensive!
|
|
Fradel, Thanks for the kind words. My Whale doesn't have a depth charge rack, basically because I couldn't fit one in without it looking out of place. The vertical fans (not sure what they’re really called) take up a lot of space, and I don't think (...) (19 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.build.military)
|
| |
| | Re: The Future of Trains
|
|
I apologize for the inability (both in time and mental stamina) to read this entire thread. But I feel the need to offer an easily-backwards compatible alternative to the power supplies thus far mentioned... No need to recharge underpowered (...) (19 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.lego, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: 7996 Metalized
|
|
(...) I ran a similar experiment using 4.5v track, and repeated it with some of the RC track. (URL) I built a oval of track with half being new 9v track and the other foil covered RC track. I cleaned the track with a bit of rubbing alcohol. I ran a (...) (19 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) This is one of the main reasons I posted asking for opinions. I think I can fix this, but I know that fixing it is going to be a lot of work. There's no point bothering if people aren't going to like the results. (...) That can be fixed (with (...) (19 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Opinions sought on rendering method
|
|
(...) That isn't a silly question at all, really. In fact, it may be more important than all the flaws that have been pointed out. Based on the comments here, there seems to be a general consensus about a few things regarding "high-quality (...) (19 years ago, 8-Oct-07, to lugnet.cad.ray, FTX)
|
