 | | Re: Possible bug? Simple light sensor condition checking.
|
|
(...) It looks to me like the c compiler optimized the assignment to the variable away, since there is no external method call (shutdown_requested() is just a macro). (...) You should make this volatile int offonpad = 0; (...) You should also put an (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
 | | 10181 Eiffle Tower
|
|
Just finished building 10181. It is a great piece. However, it is rather flimsy which seems to be a continuing problem with the large new sets. What else I saw was a slight variation in the shade of the bricks. Even within the same kind of brick I (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
 | | Re: Brickshelf and the AFOL community
|
|
(...) I also agree until we find out something from Kevin, moving files, correcting links, and stressing over lost pictures is all worthless, we all just need to take a breath and wait to hear something. It is obvious that Brickshelf has evolved (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|
| |
 | | Re: Possible bug? Simple light sensor condition checking.
|
|
I use BrickOS (LegOS) but I'm not expert in the inner workings. The code you have here appears fine to me. So, it may be a bug in BrickOS, or a problem elsewhere in your code. I will say I've ran into some interesting things when using tasks. (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.robotics.rcx.legos)
|
| |
 | | Re: Brickshelf.com A Possible Solution
|
|
(...) You're absolutely right, Jake, they're quite different. I was just pointing out that TLG probably spends about as much money on that spread as it would running something like Brickshelf. Do you think a "LEGOshelf" gallery site would be a (...) (19 years ago, 16-Jul-07, to lugnet.general, FTX)
|