 | | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) actuly the ironic thing is lego is producing something like you described for the 2007 lineup. the dinosar and grader have an ir motor controler with a seperate motor and battery pac. the only down side is it's uncompatable with the old 9v (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Technic sidebar thingie
|
|
Rene, Can you please choose to murfle (URL) The embedded graphic contains language that can be considered profane and is risque in terms of LUGNET's family friendliness. Somehow the site does not read the text contained in images. ;-) Kevin, while I (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.technic, lugnet.admin.general) !
|
| |
| | NXC/NBC beta news
|
|
Sourceforge has disabled shell access for the next several days so I am not able to upload files or make changes to html on the NBC or BricxCC site. I can, however, upload files to the standard sourceforge release page. So for the time being I will (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.robotics.nxt)
|
| |
| | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) another hypothetical here: If lego or someone else was to produce a motor that matched the pulling power or was stronger than the current 9v motor and there was a system in place to suport the amp draw would that have any affect on your (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Hypothetically speaking? the future of IR/RC trains
|
|
(...) Again, I am someone who will never convert to the plain plastic, but I see the IR system being much more useful if the battery/receiver is unbundled from the baseplate. Ideally, I would like to have the IR receiver unbundled from both battery (...) (19 years ago, 17-Feb-07, to lugnet.trains)
|
