 | | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) The phrase "BrickFest is a Trademark of Brick Events LLC" started showing up on the website by (URL) July 19, 2002> at the latest. The (URL) Wayback Machine> isn't showing me the results for the beginning of 2002. The 2002 event was the first (...) (20 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees
|
|
(...) Yes, the figure is correct. I was told it to me by the AV company directly. One thing you forget is a lot of cities, states, and facilities have unions or contractual agreements in place that would prevent us from using our own gear. In fact I (...) (20 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) Sure, but that's a slightly different conversation. (...) I'm a heartless bastard. Ask my kids. :) You're free to draw the above conclusion, although it's incorrect. The conversation has morphed into something different from what I thought I (...) (20 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Update the header of our own parts?
|
|
(...) Right now, I think that would be less than useful. Once I have something (a web interface on ldraw.org) ready to share, I may be asking for help in working through the official library. For now, I'd just appreciate your patience. Chris (20 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: BrickFest registration fees (was: LEGO Adult Fan Convention at Legoland California?)
|
|
(...) Well... yeah? Shouldn't we be talking about consequence? (...) Oh, I'm not referring to any actions specifically-- I'm following what appears to be your stance to its absolutist conclusions to test the validity of your claim. Your claim (...) (20 years ago, 12-Sep-06, to lugnet.events, lugnet.events.brickfest, FTX)
|
