 | | Re: Give me strength...
|
|
Markassius wrote in message ... (...) You got the number right, Mark. That is a cool set - I got it in a large lot (of which I said I would sell the non-Castle sets) and still haven't been able to let it go. -- Have fun! John AUCTION Page (More (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: New review site going up...
|
|
Be sure to include in your 8448 review: "...truly inspired by the 956, but built with the structural nuances of the 8480 Space Shuttle. Definately not another 8880, but strangely that's a plus." KL (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: Question from a newbie
|
|
Hi Craig, Welcome and thanks for posting! Craig Livingston <CLivin007@aol.com> wrote in message news:FGL6HI.JpL@lugnet.com... (...) legos. (...) the (...) and (...) brick-naming (...) nomenclature (...) Yes you did come to the right place (I think (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.db.brictionary)
|
| |
| | Re: 8448 ramblings
|
|
Well, since I diddn't buy any 98 Technic sets, I guess that explains my ignorance. Of course I'm always wrong about new parts anyway :) KL (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts for LDraw or parts for POV-Ray?
|
|
(...) Both l2p and l3p have their advantages depending on the goal of the user. l3p is great if you want a rendered version of a model, no matter the parts. l2p is great if you want a more detailed/smooth render and the parts are available. Thanks (...) (27 years ago, 17-Aug-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
