 | | Re: Hinge 1x2 top and SNOT
|
|
(...) Here's a slightly more complex one (URL) might not quite work as pictured but shoule be adjustble to a working form. Tim (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Hinge 1x2 top and SNOT
|
|
(...) Nice Idea - I'll have to use that sometime Jeffery (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Hinge 1x2 top and SNOT
|
|
(...) Here's a little variant that should be good for trains and space. Tim (URL) (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.castle, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) I'm fairly sure Eric might try to off himself if his posting privileges were permanently revoked. Dunno if that's the reason Larry is suggesting softer treatment for a greater offense, but it's something to consider. Soren (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.people)
|
| |
| | Re: Hinge 1x2 top and SNOT
|
|
(...) Can I nominate Fsnot for it. I'll give you a hint about that one: the F stands for the type of brick and Erik Amzallag, James Mathis and myself have explored it right in this very forum ;) Tim PS. It's no great secret that I have a little (...) (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.build.schleim, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Hinge 1x2 top and SNOT
|
|
(...) Gsnot is cool! I was not aware of this particular Snot (it should have been Xpost to schleim before). Dsnot, Gsnot...are you planning an alphabet SNOT project similar to the SW ships alphabet project ? ;-) (...) (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.space, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: One good message (kind of) from LEGO at last... (April Fool's Day)
|
|
(...) Yes Mark, on April the first I wanted to post about an IR-reciever in form of a "4x4 block, 2 plates high plus the 2x2 bulb on top". That is correct. And of course it was April Fool's Day (so maybe LUGNET was not working properly). ;-) Ben (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Hmmm, interesting to compare that view of Eric, who has shown a wilful disregard for the ToS, with (URL) your opinion of Jojo>. (...) That would involve someone deciding what "completely inappropriate" is. But as you brought it up, which posts (...) (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: One good message (kind of) from LEGO at last... (April Fool's Day)
|
|
(...) So you're saying this is a 4x4 block, 2 plates high plus the 2x2 bulb on top? Just want to be sure of the correct information :-) Mark (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Lugnet: WAKE UP!
|
|
(...) Me for one. It was deserved but I sincerely hope this is a timeout, to be lifted when Eric apologises and indicates he understands that he needs to comply with the ToS, and will do so, and not a permanent loss. Further, and just as (...) (20 years ago, 2-Apr-06, to lugnet.people, FTX)
|
