 | | Re: Request for info on the Control Lab Interface.
|
|
(...) I had the same problem I bought the interface for 295.00 I think. Then another 18.00 for the cable (a generic one doesn’t work neither does the mindstorm one ) & 69.00 For Robolab 2.5. I got everything working but I didn’t like it’s (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.robotics, lugnet.technic)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) I think this is a pretty good idea. This way people with have to think of new strategies, other than having the heaviest robot, so it can pull everything including the other table. So I'm for this idea of a low weight limit. Vitali (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: [rtlToronto] rtlToronto21 Tentative Ruleset Published
|
|
(...) While I think the idea of different class's is a good idea, I dont think we get enough robots to warrant a game for each class. I've read all the ideas, and it looks like people are pointing to a logical weight limit. This begrudgingly makes (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) How many times does it have to be explained to you before it seeps into that drug soaked blancmange you use for a brain? Read the thread again. The only poor attitude here is yours, Eric. The sooner you realise that, the better off we will all (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, lugnet.off-topic.fun, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: IRON MECHA - The Qwelder Mech - FOR SALE
|
|
(...) They are not explicitly unwelcome in any group charters (that I'm aware of). The unwelcomeness in any particular group is implicit (not explicit) from the overall site TOS, unless explicitly welcomed in the group charter (which is not the case (...) (20 years ago, 29-Mar-06, to lugnet.market.buy-sell-trade, FTX)
|
